Hi Brett, > I'm still really unconvinced about this report. It should be working on > information from the POM, not assembly descriptor - and I'm not sure how
Agree but actually supported formats are in the assembly descriptor. > much it adds over just typing up a quick APT right now. Maybe 5 minutes? ;) > Can we move it to the sandbox, then talk about what information to add > to the POM to make it effective? Perhaps elaboration next to downloadUrl > in distributionManagement. +1 > There are problems with the current implementation: > - parsing out assembly plugin configuration ignores any defaults > - some projects don't have an assembly - the jar in the repo is their > distribution Good points. > Sorry that I hadn't replied earlier. NP Thanks for your support. Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
