On 30/11/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that's fair, but if it's directly used, it should be directly specified. > It wasn't working on this end, so I'm not sure what the difference is...
I've often encountered this situation where direct dependencies are not declared as they are supplied transitively. Is there any feature on the roadmap to either warn when this happens, or have an explicit 'export' option on dependencies to safeguard against this? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
