Brett Porter wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Not being able to use scpexe is a problem as the scp deployment is
broken after the introduction of the directory handling code so maybe
that bit should be rolled back in wagon for the time being until it can
be tested properly. If deployment with scpexe is not viable and the scp
method doesn't work then we definitely have a problem.
It wasn't the directory handling code, it was any number of other
changes made in the last wagon release. The previous release also had
problems - in fact in my environment the current scp:// works *better*
than the previous release.
We need to do a lot more work on this, no doubt - but rolling back
doesn't solve any problems here.
I will try a deploy using scp, but it was not working at all and if
scpexe is problematic what do you propose as a solution? It's not just
for our deployments but it creates a potentially unworkable situation
for deployments in general.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
