John Casey wrote: > Stupid question maybe, but can we deprecate the method using > o.c.d.s.Sink, and duplicate the method to one that takes an > o.a.m.d.s.Sink instance? Then at least we may be able to soften the > eventual blow of moving off to the new APIs at some later time. I did that originally, but actually using it from the site plugin breaks all the old reports that don't implement it :) > > Other than this, it all sounds great. BTW, Jason has also offered to > help out with releasing duty...I'm not sure whether you're still > having problems with deployment permissions on files (see email from > Vincent re: integration testing), but I'm grateful to have the backup! :) > Sure, we'll work through it then. > I'm probably going to call a vote for releasing the first version of > the it plugin today, and try to get it out next weekend when I hit the > in-laws' house...I don't think it should wait until January. Ok...
- Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
