[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-39?page=comments#action_55234 ]
Arik Kfir commented on MSUREFIRE-39: ------------------------------------ the javascript idea sounds great to me ;-) > Add integration logic that allows report to be created for junit OR testng > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MSUREFIRE-39 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-39 > Project: Maven 2.x Surefire Plugin > Type: Improvement > Environment: any > Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert > > > I'm currently in the middle of patching/working with testng and the > maven-surefire plugin core parts to provide a seamless testng integration > point and am on the final task of getting the report to be a little > friendlier. This is the jira issue for the surefire portion: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-23 > I think at the very least I wanted to change the runtime to ~not~ try and > parse class/package constructs out of the test name attributes, but work in > an agnostic manner to just group things as they appear in the xml output. I > also intend to embed a very minimal amount of javascript into the generated > html page so that report errors/stack traces can have hide/show buttons > enabling the detailed viewing of their contents. > Does this sound reasonable to everyone? I've got the source checked out right > now and will be working on this today. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
