On 1/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > javadoc problem (maybe it is already fixed?)
Today, apparently! Sorry for the noise. > Also, I think the doclet path should be an artifact reference instead, > which could be added as a plugin dependency. Can you expand on that? :) I gather this would keep me from having to give the path to the jar file (which is obviously not portable, but I was in "just make it work" mode at that point.) -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
