It works, thanks. But the coverage aggragator reports its total as an integer, not as a percentage. Which means it is not reported as a bar graph (like the Junit pass report) and that the coverage percentages are totalled in the last row - which is quite wrong....
See the attached file. Thanks, Nascif -----Original Message----- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:43 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Maven-dashboard 1.9, Maven 1.0.2 and Cobertura It's here: http://cvs.apache.org/repository/maven/plugins/maven-dashboard-plugin-1.9-SNAPSHOT.jar -Lukas Nascif Abousalh-Neto wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > I rolled back my Jelly changes. The latest snapshot is still broken as in the > beginning. > > All the files in the snapshot .jar file (just downloaded it again, both from > ibiblio and cvs.apache.org) have yesterday's date. Either it is a time zone > issue (I am in the US, Eastern coast) or I am not really getting your latest > code. > > To be sure I looked into the aggregator code and sure enough: > > <u:loadText encoding="UTF-8" > file="${maven.dashboard.aggregator.coberturalipc.artifact}" > var="artifactAsText" /> > <u:replace new="" old="<!DOCTYPE coverage SYSTEM > "http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/xml/coverage-02.dtd">" > > Can you send me a .jar file directly? > Thanks, > Nascif > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:55 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Maven-dashboard 1.9, Maven 1.0.2 and Cobertura > > Hi Nascif, I just replied to the other mail, please check if this is > working before we go into SAX parser configuration issues (and make > our headaches bigger!) > > -Lukas > > > Nascif Abousalh-Neto wrote: > >>Hi Lukas, >>Continuing the discussion at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPDASHBOARD-31, >>yes, I can help test 1.9 on 1.0.2. I will revert my libraries back to their >>original state and revert back to official 1.8 in the mean time. >>Let me know when you have a new version that should work on 1.0.2 as well. >>On the topic of supporting cobertura, the fact that coverage.xml includes an >>external DTD reference is proving to be a headache. The aggregator just >>removes the line before parsing. Has anybody looked into configuring the SAX >>parser to ignore external entities, as described in >>http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipcfsx.html ? >>Thanks, >> Nascif >> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
