OK, our fault that we did not read the vote carefully, but what good does it get to release a 3 bug fixes after 4 months of waiting. We have lots of people using the assembly plugins using snapshot And I beleive it is stable.
-D On 1/27/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I said in the vote only three bugfixes were into 2.0.1 to make it > more stable and prevent new funtionality that could bring new bugs. > > On 1/27/06, jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/27/06, jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 1/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 Binding: John, Brett, Arnaud, Lukas, Emmanuel, Vincent S > > > > +1 Non-binding: Mike, Alex, Dan > > > > > > > > I'll proceed with the release > > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > are you sure you released the correct artifacts? > > > > > > Now I get it: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/plugins/branches/maven-assembly-plugin-2.0.x/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/assembly/AssemblyMojo.java?rev=370695&view=log > > > > The trunk was copied on the 15th of October, and branched on the 19th > > of January. So all the fixes that went in between those dates did not > > make it into 2.0.1. > > > > That's something I didn't expect. The timeframe between copy and > > branch was pretty long. > > > > Jerome > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
