+1 with the previous comments (Jason, Emmanuel) about to merge some of them.
Arnaud On 2/7/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, especially for changes/jira and announcement stuff. > > > > On 2/7/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not a vote. +1's here are just "I've read and think it's all > > good", but generally I'm just looking for feedback on specific plugins > > and decision points before taking this any further forward. > > > > Some of the plugins that wound up in mojo seem better suited to the main > > Apache project due to a) originally coming from there b) having the core > > libraries located there c) being essential to the day to day use of the > > project. > > > > These are the ones I'm thinking of: > > - jxr report (relates to jxr) > > - surefire report (relates to surefire) > > - changes/jira/announcement report (relates to issue stuff in sandbox) > > - changelog report (relates to scm) > > - dependency-maven-plugin (sounds generally handy in eliminating a lot > > of small antrunning). > > > > The other ones I'm tossing up: > > - taglist (generally useful report, originally came from m1) > > > > I put out a call for opinions and while the relevant mojo people were in > > favour, some of the Maven developers were either on the fence or against > > it. However, I didn't really receive an answer to my responses to those > > concerns. > > As a community we need to decide where we are going to develop > > individual plugins. As I understand it, mojo.codehaus.org was > > established to: > > - develop things that can't be entirely under the ASL. > > - avoid developing plugins that rotted and tied due to lack of community > > in m1 > > - give a place for individual plugin developers to start out but still > > operate in the same way as the Maven community. > > > > It's always been my thought that plugins at maven.apache.org should be > > those used by 80% of Maven users or essential to its operation, and > > those that relate to the Maven subprojects themselves. Also, plugins in > > like groups should be kept together. > > > > So, time to bring it here and get everyone's feedback again. If you > > already had objections, please voice them again if they are still a concern. > > > > What do others think? Note that this would imply bringing in a couple of > > new committers, but they are people that have been generally helpful. > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > .::You're welcome ::. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
