Glassfish packages all the J2ee stack modules in a single javaee.jar. But I doubt you want to force everyone to download the 1.2mb javaee.jar file when they only need 1 or 2 apis...
That's why I only compared class files -- unpacked the javaee.jar file, grabbed the persistence and transaction subdirs, and compared to mine generated from source. There are "no differences" between these class files. I will proceed with pom/Maven, and respond again later today... Wayne On 2/28/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Give it a try to one of the projects, generate the pom, build it with > maven and post here the differencies. With that info we'd be able to > make a decision. > > On 2/28/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, that's tag SJSAS-9_0-B32G-BETA-10_Feb_2006 ! This corresponds > > to the most recent Milestone build 5 of the Glassfish project. > > > > So I just checked out from CVS, compiled, and compared my generated > > binaries (classes only) to those provided by Glassfish for the > > persistence-api and transaction-api modules only. > > > > As far as SFV is concerned, these are identical files/directories. > > This is as we expected, but we needed to confirm it. So the binaries > > (Sun binary license) being delivered by Glassfish are identical to the > > source files (CDDL licensed). > > > > So... given this, what's the next step? > > > > I can revert my entire local CVS root to the B32G build, compile all > > the APIs, create the appropriate POMs (assuming we can make a decision > > on groupId and artifactId), and create bundles for all these Glassfish > > APIs, if we agree on this approach. > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > On 2/28/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oh, this nice. javax.persistence especially. I've been doing some EJB3 > > > > stuff and that is a sore point. JTA too. > > > > > > Since you expressed an interest in persistence and transaction, I > > > focused efforts on those two modules. > > > > > > I pulled down the Glassfish CVS code, compiled into classes, and > > > compared to the classes delivered by Glassfish distribution using SFV > > > (its like MD5 for a group of files/directories). > > > > > > Found my compiled classes had a number of differences including new files. > > > > > > Realized I was using CVS head rather than tag > > > SJAS-9_0-B32G-BETA-10_Feb_2006. > > > > > > So now I'm pulling the tag code from CVS, will repeat the compile and > > > compare steps, and report back shortly... > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
