???
I've trie using Firefox "live http header" to get spring 2.0-m2 :
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.springframework/jars/spring-web-2.0-m2.jar
GET /maven/org.springframework/jars/spring-web-2.0-m2.jar HTTP/1.1
Host: www.ibiblio.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr;
rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1
Accept:
text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-Language: fr,fr-fr;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.springframework/jars/
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Connection: Keep-Alive
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:23:48 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_choke/0.06 PHP/4.3.11
Last-Modified: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:28:04 GMT
Etag: "247976-25d9f-43e28774;440735c4"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 155039
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Cache: MISS from www.ibiblio.org
Age: 0
----------------------------------------------------------
After carefully watching, I cannot detect any redirect to
www.ibiblio.org/maven2 or anything else.
Could you explain me what you expected ?
Brett Porter a écrit :
It's already done.
use wget -S or the http headers firefox extension to get a JAR from the
m1 repository and watch carefully.
- Brett
Nicolas De Loof wrote:
Hello,
AFAIK in m1, poms from central repository are not used (neither downloaded)
Could'nt m1.1+ be enhanced to download dependencies from a m2-styled
repository ?
This only means converting groupId(with".")/type(s)/artifactId-version.type
to
groupId(with"/")/artifactId/version/type(s)/artifactId-version.type
Why such an idea ? Because AFAIK m2 is built by converting m1 artifacts.
So m2 repo includes all m1 artifacts. But what if an artifact has been
created in m2 repo but not in m1 ? And how long will we have 2
repositories ?
Making m1.1+ access m2 repo would make possible to deprecate m1-like
"legacy" repositories.
maven 1.1+ could try to download using m2 repository structure, and fall
back to legacy mode on failure.
Is this a stupid idea ?
Nico.
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
all copies of this message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or
any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
