you're right should be codehaus.org, although for downloading is not a
problem, no authz info needed
On 8/24/06, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Any reasons why the new standard on repo id is not applied [1]?, ie
<id>codehaus.org</id>
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/-m2--ids-of-repositories-are-inconsistently-used-in-poms-tf2107348.html#a5808879
2006/8/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: carlos
> Date: Wed Aug 23 18:58:29 2006
> New Revision: 434284
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=434284&view=rev
> Log:
> Added codehaus snapshot repo
>
> Modified:
> maven/shared/trunk/maven-user/pom.xml
>
> Modified: maven/shared/trunk/maven-user/pom.xml
> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/trunk/maven-user/pom.xml?rev=434284&r1=434283&r2=434284&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- maven/shared/trunk/maven-user/pom.xml (original)
> +++ maven/shared/trunk/maven-user/pom.xml Wed Aug 23 18:58:29 2006
> @@ -25,6 +25,17 @@
> <module>maven-user-acegi</module>
> </modules>
>
> + <repositories>
> + <repository>
> + <id>codehaus-snapshots</id>
> + <name>Codehaus Snapshot Development Repository</name>
> + <url>http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/</url>
> + <releases>
> + <enabled>false</enabled>
> + </releases>
> + </repository>
> + </repositories>
> +
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <dependency>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
