Oh sorry I was sure it was when you have a timestamp in your filename. Maybe I should test it again. Anyway, I just think there should a big note on the web site about this issue somewhere until the new version is released because it's really confusing at first. I spent a lot of time figuring out why Maven wasn't downloading the newer snapshots.
On 9/18/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's the opposite to what you keep saying. It's when you *don't* have a timestamp in the version number. I could have sworn John fixed this recently, though... On 19/09/2006, at 1:16 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote: > That's the real one : > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908 > > On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Oops wrong one, forget the last email. >> >> On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Here's the issue I am speaking about : >> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289 >> > >> > On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I >> > > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its >> filename >> > > or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of >> months ago >> > > saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find >> the JIRA >> > > issue. >> > > >> > > This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it. >> > > >> > > On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot >> apache >> > > > > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a >> unique version >> > > > > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a >> lot of people >> > > > > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. >> > > > >> > > > Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here? >> > > > >> > > > This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x- >> SNAPSHOT.jar if one >> > > > is already present in the local repository' problem, correct? >> > > > >> > > > It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named >> version >> > > > _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with >> have >> > > > uniqueVersion set to false for that reason. >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Wendy >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
