Pretty sure we've shouted it down with reasons before, hopefully the
archives will be of some assistance :)
- Brett
On 05/12/2006, at 12:08 AM, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, before we jump into this, let's consider the use case at
hand. While easily solved by pre-package at this point, we may
find other needs.
To take these suggestions even further, perhaps the idea of a fixed
set of phases is too limiting. An alternative would be to number
phases, from (say) 0 to 1000, with the current named phases as
aliases for 100, 200, etc. Then it's easy for plugins which need it
to slip in an extra phase.
I've lost count of the number of times I've told people on #maven
that there is no way to ensure that a particular execution runs
between phases X and Y. Admittedly, there's a bug which means that
execution order isn't preserved within a phase, and fixing that
would ameliorate this.
Anyway, I'm fully expected to be shouted down, and told that this
will only lead to confusion; however, I think it's worth considering.
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telephony Gateways Project Manager
Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778
http://www.mxtelecom.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
