there is an ear plugin....if you rework that patch to be another module all together and generate that artifact with the ear plugin then I'll be happy to take a look and apply it I think...but its not standard practice to have a war artifact producing and ear :)
out of curiousity, what are you adding that would require an ear over a war j2ee wise? jesse On 2/22/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just added an updated patch on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1167. Continuum will now successfully send emails under JBoss. The patch also contains a new module to create an ear file for the war. This is only activated through a profile named "ear", so to create the ear file you must "mvn -Pear .....". The context root is defined in the main pom as continuum and can be overridden using - Dcontinuum.ear.contextRoot=whateverYouWantItToBe. [ Show ยป<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1167>] thierry lach<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=thierrylach> [22/Feb/07 03:55 PM] I've added to the patch a little bit. It contains a fix so that email can get sent. It also contains a new module to create an ear file for the war. This is only activated through a profile named "ear", so to create the ear file you must "mvn -Pear .....". The context root is defined in the main pom and can be overridden using - Dcontinuum.ear.contextRoot=whateverYouWantItToBe. On 2/16/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW it looks like someone corrected application.xml so the existing patch > should be sufficient. > > On 2/15/07, Thierry Lach < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > SUCCESS! > > > > OK it looks like the root cause is the inability to find class > > org.codehaus.plexus.registry.CommonsConfigurationRegistry. I think the > > correct class name should be > > org.codehaus.plexus.registry.commons.CommonsConfigurationRegistry. since > > that is what is contained in the plexus-registry-commons jar. I've changed > > the implementation name in the file > > continuum-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/plexus/application.xml and it > > seems to work now - I've been able to configure it and am now running a > > maven1 build. I'll update the patch sometime this evening to include the > > change to application.xml. > > > > > > On 2/15/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yep - my rejoicing was a little premature it seems. War deploy seems > > > to behave fine but the website itself doesn't get up and run. > > > > > > On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > allright here we go: > > > > with these two datasources things start moving the right direction > > > > > > > > > > <snip/> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Hilco Wijbenga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:39 PM > > > > To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: JBoss Support > > > > > > > > On 2/15/07, Thierry Lach <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > Can you post the contents of your derby-ds.xml file please? I'm > > > > > guessing that the example I used for the Continuum+on_JBoss > > > > example > > > > > isn't correct enough for continuum. > > > > > > > > See http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+on+JBoss > > > > > > > > There used to be something similar for Continuum. I think your JNDI > > > > name > > > > is wrong; all the silly stuff (comp/env/jdbc/) will be added by > > > > JBoss > > > > ... IIRC, it's been a while. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
