On Tuesday 27 February 2007 14:27, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On 27 Feb 07, at 12:57 PM 27 Feb 07, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I'm working on fixing the issues in the gpg plugin. I just > > committed some > > changes but would like a bit of discussion before finalizing some > > of it. > > > > MGPG-2 - Allow the selection of a particular signature > > I added a keyname parameter (-Dkeyname=foo) etc... which can be > > used. It > > maps directly to the gpg --local-user flag. That should solve > > that one. > > Something we're trying to practice is namespace usage in parameters > so use > > -Dgpg.keyname > > So that other plugins that might use "keyname" can do the same and > not cause a collision.
Should the passphrase change to -Dgpg.passphrase to match? That would break your release instructions when we go to the newer version of the gpg plugin. Not sure if that's a huge deal as it would require moving to a new parent pom anyway. -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
