On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 07:21 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > This is my take: > - if they contain a license block in the file, then it's that > license, otherwise > - if they contain <license> element(s), then those license(s), otherwise > - Apache License 2.0 > > I'll run this past the PMC to see if we all believe this consistently. >
Hi Brett, I was wondering if you have heard back anything on this issue yet? Thanks, Deepak > On 14/02/2007, at 7:10 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > What license are the pom files in the maven2 repository > > (repo1.maven.org/maven2) under? We need to know if we are allowed to > > redistribute those poms with Fedora. > > > > Thanks, > > Deepak > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
