That's the whole problem. Once I start paring down my build to something
I can give out publically, it stops occuring. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:22 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: "Component returned which is not the same manager" ?

I have looked at the code for the 1.0-alpha-9-stable and it is
considerably different. In fact the bug that I fixed is not present (as
far as I can see) in that version...

If perhaps someone could replicate it in that version then I could look
into it.

Andy

On 13 Mar 2007, at 15:07, Jason van Zyl wrote:

>
> On 13 Mar 07, at 6:53 AM 13 Mar 07, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>> It is possible that the error was slowing things down, as returning 
>> the wrong manager could cause a tree to be traversed rather than 
>> returning the first leaf.
>>
>> Getting it into 2.0.6 is not very likely, as it is cutting edge 
>> container which I don't think is slated to move to the 2.0.x branch. 
>> I will investigate further and see what can be done.
>>
>
> I create a 1.0-alpha-9-stable branch so maybe we could slip it in  
> there. I just wanted to use the exact same container with a  
> detailed errata of what we fixed. The properties converter is the  
> only thing that's different right now, any change we could wedge  
> this fix in there too?
>
> Jason.
>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:58, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Andy! When you found the problem, does it make sense that  
>>> it was
>>> causing my builds to slow down even when I disabled the warning  
>>> output?
>>>
>>> Is there any chance we can get this in 2.0.6?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:17 AM
>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: "Component returned which is not the same manager" ?
>>>
>>> I fixed this last week, and is now released in plexus-containers  
>>> 1.0-
>>> alpha-19.
>>> This fix is present in maven-2.1-SNAPSHOT also.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> On 27 Feb 2007, at 14:47, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been seeing this forever, it's very annoying. It significantly
>>>> slows down our build when this happens, something along the lines
>>>> of 20
>>>> -> 40 minutes (100% increase). I thought it was because of all the
>>>> logging so I recompiled that jar to remove the warning but it is  
>>>> still
>>>> slow when it happens. I think it could be that since the object  
>>>> isn't
>>>> returned to the correct manager, it isn't able to reuse them  
>>>> correctly
>>>> and results in an explosion of object creation. The original  
>>>> issue is:
>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-287
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andrew Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:21 AM
>>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>>> Subject: Re: "Component returned which is not the same manager" ?
>>>>
>>>> This is a plexus bug, registered on JIRA already.
>>>> Not sure if anyone knows what is causing it, but there is one  
>>>> possible
>>>> related change being looked into I believe.
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Feb 2007, at 02:39, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know what this means?
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> [WARNING] Component returned which is not the same manager.
>>>>> Ignored.
>>>>> component=org.apache.maven.profiles.activation.JdkPrefixProfileAct

>>>>> iva
>>>
>>>>> t
>>>>
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> </snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing a tone of these in the Geronimo build... seems to  
>>>>> happen
>>>>> randomly from build to build.  I ran one build and did not see
>>>>> this, then I started up a new build and I see like 1000x of these?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know?
>>>>>
>>>>> --jason
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>>> ---
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to