Joakim, The "current" practice (always subject to change at apache) is to use version numbers with incubator or incubating in the name. For example: 2.0-incubator-M2
There has been talks about using a groupId, but the general consensus has been that if it's in the version, it's unnecessary and it makes it harder for dependents to migrate after the project graduates. They can just update their dependencyManagement section of their top level pom and not go through bunches of child poms to change groupId's. In anycase, I just wanted folks here to be aware of the discussions going on. Dan On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:37, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: > One question I have ... > > Do you want to identify the incubating projects on central in any way? > A groupId prefix of org.apache.incubating.* for example? > > - Joakim > > Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Just to let everyone know, there is a long thread about the > > incubator M2 repository on general@incubator.apache.org: > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200703.mb > >ox/<31cc37360703140920h6a601b57gbb86ff0cd5e8049b%40mail.gmail.com> > > > > Since this affects Maven users as well as projects like NMaven, it > > would be good to get other peoples input, especially those that run > > the central repository. > > > > The other complication will be if they decide to remove it, we'll > > have to merge it into the ibiblio sync respository. Are the tools > > ready for that? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
