Just a user here, but definitly a +1.

Dependency version resolution should always stay tuned to the POM of the 
current project being built.

Denis.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 16 mars 2007 08:12
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior
> 
> +1
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After working with it a little this week I would like to propose to 
> > make
> > MNG-1577 behavior introduced the default. Builds are completely and 
> > totally unpredictable without this behavior. The behavior 
> in 2.0.5 is 
> > fundamentally broken. To are totally prey to any dependency 
> introduced 
> > by a dependency which makes no sense and completely counter 
> intuitive. 
> > I stabilized a massive build this week simply by using the behavior 
> > present in the 2.0.x branch. I don't think we're doing anyone any 
> > favors leaving the old behavior in. After watching a disaster be 
> > recovered by using this new behavior I feel that the patch 
> should go 
> > in as is and become the default behavior. This puts the user in 
> > control which is the way it should be.
> > 
> > I propose we make this the default behavior. Can anyone think of a 
> > case where this degree of control would break an existing build?
> > 
> > This patch saved my bacon this week, I think this behavior makes a 
> > world of difference to users.
> > 
> > Jason.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to