Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 20 Mar 07, at 7:57 AM 20 Mar 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 19/03/2007, at 11:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
You mean in a separate subproject of doxia. I can change the
directory so how about:
doxia
doxia-site (sub project)
doxia-book (sub project)
These sound fine to me.
Me too. What is the most important aspect of Doxia given how many
plugins you can write for it is the external APIs and how you use
Doxia in an embedded fashion.
Agreed. The core should be free of any site/book stuff for the 1.0.
Trygve do you see anything that can move out. Like the indexing stuff?
That is probably most pertinent to books and sites, any thoughts to
where that should live?
Can't think of an obvious place right now.
To me the design of Doxia is not very useful if you want to produce
books and/or sites useful for anyone other than developers so I haven't
put much work into Doxia after my book work last year. I have some big
plans somewhere for Doxia 2 but that won't happen sometime soon.
--
Trygve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
