Hi Milos
I was just expressing an opinion :)
I'm not part of the Maven team.

best regards,
 Kaloyan


On 3/28/07, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if I understood correctly, OSGI bundles should have a special
packaging like ear/wars do and define it's lifecycle to include the
OSGI stuff in the resulting binary

Milos

On 3/28/07, Damien Lecan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok I understand, but you didn't answer my (not clear) question : if
> > > OSGi packaging is fast enough, will OSGi manifest entries be
> > > transparently added to every maven-build jars ?
> > >
> > > Or will it be an OSGi developer option, that will never be known and
> > > used by other common people ?
> >
> > IMHO this should depend on the type of the artifact i.e. the OSGI
> > bundles should be recognizable as such in the way we recognize EJB's
> > or WAR files.
>
> EJB jar files can be OSGI bundles too ! :)
> See www.easybeans.org project
>
> But you're right, for WAR and EAR files, OSGi bundling has not been
> explored yet and should be enriched with OSGi information.
>
> Damien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to