On 02/04/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
There is no reason why we shouldn't be able to do this.
Totally agree. And drawing this information into a known, persistent, and up-to-date location can only help get more people involved. The most successful releases will come when 3, 4 or more people are popping in fixes in those 4-6 weeks.
Just to highlight what I was getting at in the previous mail and the site mail earlier (though it probably goes without saying) - this will only be successful if everyone is also diligent about things like maintaining JIRA, CI (when it gets running again), testing, and some level of documentation throughout the whole release cycle. There's not much point cutting a release on time if it drops in stability or %complete in terms of tests or docs. That's all I was getting at.
- Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
