Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 2 Apr 07, at 1:01 PM 2 Apr 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:04 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Should this include the full change log like previous releases?
I added a pointer to the roadmap, I don't think we need to entirely
replicate the list produced by JIRA. But users should be able to
navigate from the release notes to the full list of fixes.
IMO, the list needs to be in svn (and I added it). JIRA issues can be
reopened and edited, and may disappear from the generated list.
So then the pointers to those issues are just as meaningless. If you
don't retain some integrity in the issue management system then what's
the point really?
Just copying text around doesn't have much value. I don't think it
happens that often that an issue is removed. If any text is going to
be added it should be the changes text with full descriptions. I don't
see much use in copying text out of JIRA.
+1 for static release notes content.
I think that if a jira issue gets re-opened, then the linked jira report
will then be out of date.
Also, if a reorganization of the jira occurs, the release information is
lost too.
Also, if jira isn't available, the release notes are also not available.
I'm in favor of static release notes.
Me too. And we can generate it easily with swizzle.
Emmanuel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
