Actually, that depends on who you ask. If you read the FSF site you'd
get the impression it is not. JBoss says it is. What is most important
is that according to what I've seen on Apache legal-discuss the project
can't have direct dependencies on LGPL'd software.
It would make a lot of sense to somehow require users to "accept"
licenses before they can use a non-Apache plugin. I'm not sure how that
would work - maybe when the plugin is installed?
Ralph
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm no lawyer, but I was under the impression that with Java muck,
that importing and referencing [L]GPL classes in non-[L]GPL code was
not legit. Or is that just for GPL?
just GPL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
