Same here. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 9:02 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 2.1

Won't work every time.

We have a corporate pom, it's pretty much stable and it won't change often. All 
our projects inherit from that one, it will be a pain to update everything 
every time we would want to upgrade some plug-ins.

Stéphane

On 4/12/07, Hayes, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to give my 2 cents on this issue.
>
> Would it be possible to maintain a super POM on repo1 that contains a 
> vetted set of plugin versions and then version that POM appropriately 
> based on new releases of core plugins?  Then it would simply be an 
> inclusion of a specific parent version in a project POM that would 
> control which plugins to take.  I think this is what people probably 
> do internally but if it is maintained on repo1, it would save a lot of 
> work for a lot of people.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:40 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 2.1
>
>
> >If I need a specific version (usual to workaround a known issue) then 
> >I specify it in the the pom. Otherwise I want the latest.
> This is the current problem, where builds are done with undetermined 
> versions. (ie the version for dev a might not match dev b)
>
> >For snapshot builds if I will use specified, then latest.
>
> >For a released build, I want the pom to be transformed and fully 
> >locked down so that the build is reproducible.  And I don't want to 
> >do that manually.
>
> I would expect that my snapshot builds to be exactly the same as the 
> eventual release build for that version. The last thing I need is 
> release to decide for me which versions to use. I do want to do it 
> manually, because I want to try out each new plugin before I bless it 
> and allow it into the build process for the rest of the team. I've had 
> too many occurrences where a plugin change breaks my build (I'm ok 
> with that, it's necessary for forward progress). By manually vetting a 
> plugin, it gives me a chance to make any adjustments needed.
>
> It's no different than how we upgrade Maven itself: I have used 
> enforcer to lock my build to 2.0.5 until I can get all the depMgt 
> straightened out and then I will move everyone forward.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to