2007/4/9, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 8 Apr 07, at 10:41 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote: > It seems apparent now that we should push forward with the ng > stuff. I was going to test if it is at least equivalent to trunk > and then propose bringing it in to replace trunk and start to plan > out 1.0 from there. > It doesn't work the same yet, the mojos are just stubbed out and I have yet to get it to create an archetype though the tests are pretty good so far.
Really please to ear ;) I will, starting from next week, refactor the descriptor as proposed. Raphaël
> Does anyone have any bandwidth to help with that? I will walk through the code in its entirety but not until next week. Jason. > > Thanks, > Brett > > On 09/04/2007, at 12:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >> On 3/4/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The Archetype plugin has lost the ability to "package" non-Java >>> resources. It looks like this happened with the addition of 'sub >>> packages' for Java sources. >> >> ping. Any thoughts on whether the problem with "packaging" resources >> should be fixed in the existing archetype code or whether >> maven-archetypeng will be ready soon? >> >> It's http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-65 . >> >> -- >> Wendy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
