As it turned out, we didn't talk about the artifact resolution
mechanism in great detail. Jason told us he is working on a paper to
describe how it might be re-implemented in 2.1.
Jason, any chance you could push what you have into SVN so we can
provide some feedback and see how it might line up with Mark's work?
If it is compatible, and the patch is good, then we could apply that
to trunk now.
Either way, I don't think applying this on 2.0.x is a good move. We
have to draw the line about new features getting added there.
Thanks!
- Brett
On 17/05/2007, at 10:06 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 30/04/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Mark further explained, I think his proposal is entirely different
and could be adapted to whatever strategy you apply in general here.
Was there any consensus on whether to apply MNG-612 to 2.0.x after all
the conferences?
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
