Separating this discussion from the vote.
On 24/05/2007, at 2:53 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I don't consider working on Archetype at Mojo unacceptable.
Raphaël is welcome to work on it there, of course.
But this vote is about where the active development of the code will
continue. And I have to disagree on Mojo, even if it is temporary.
The Maven PMC has no oversight over the project, nor any authority.
The code at mojo is not covered under any of Apache's legal documents
- there's no paper trail for the changes occuring.
People from here may participate there, but they don't watch beyond
their own plugins (classic example: http://www.discursive.com/blog/
2007/04/mojo-dev-but-did-you-test-it.html)
In addition, if it does get brought back, we lose the entire version
history from when it was changed at mojo.
Mojo is not a part of this project. There is good work being done on
independent plugins there - that's why it exists. But it is not an
incubator for this project.
Cheers,
Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
