How about simply using XSD for validation and accepting namespaced properties?
Mark On 04/07/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-07-04 09:04:10 +0200, "Jochen Wiedmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 7/4/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can properties be used in this way in the pom.xml? Since the pom >> language has no control structures like loops etc., it should be hard >> to use lists. Could you give an example, maybe we can find a way to >> change the proposal to suit both needs? > > They cannot be used that way in the pom.xml, but by plugins. Ok. If we check during pom interpolation, this should work. With the proposal, it is still possible to set any variable to any value in the pom. If option values are specified, they are validated, if not, any value is valid. System or "-D" properties would be set for the plugins, but only validated if they are used in the pom. Regards, Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
