Hi Lukas, I don't think that it is confusing: the parent is only used to build all modules and we deploy artifacts on snapshot repository. FYI, the "promote-ready" concept is also used in sandbox/trunk/plugins.
I think you could revert them. Cheers, Vincent 2007/8/27, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Vincent Siveton wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > > > 2007/8/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>Author: ltheussl > >>Date: Mon Aug 27 03:45:20 2007 > >>New Revision: 570064 > >> > >>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570064&view=rev > >>Log: > >>Align sandbox poms > >> > >>Modified: > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-editor/pom.xml > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-linkcheck/pom.xml > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-maven-plugin/pom.xml > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-module-mediawiki/pom.xml > >> maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/pom.xml > >> > >>Modified: maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml > >>URL: > >>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml?rev=570064&r1=570063&r2=570064&view=diff > >>============================================================================== > >>--- maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml (original) > >>+++ maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml Mon Aug 27 03:45:20 2007 > >>@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > >>-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > >>+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >> > >> <!-- > >> Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > >>@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ > >> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > >> <parent> > >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.doxia</groupId> > >>- <artifactId>doxia</artifactId> > >>+ <artifactId>doxia-sandbox</artifactId> > >> <version>1.0-alpha-9-SNAPSHOT</version> > >> </parent> > > > > > > IMHO it is better to use doxia parent instead of doxia-sandbox. > > It should be more easy to promote them. > > Is it? I just wanted to unify the deps since some modules used doxia, > some doxia-sandbox. But since we already have a doxia-sandbox parent > pom, and it extends doxia, I thought we should use it. Wouldn't it risk > confusion eg if we deploy sites for sandbox components that don't have > "sandbox" somewhere in their id? > > -Lukas > > > [snip] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
