On 7 Sep 07, at 5:16 PM 7 Sep 07, Brett Porter wrote:
file:// ?
I also know of some wagon-scm + SVN uses (though they could
download over HTTP).
Right, deployment is a different story. I use the wagon-scm stuff for
audit trail and deploy there. I'm talking strictly about pulling.
I'd be hesitant to remove this without doing some decent polling of
users (and probably a deprecation cycle).
Yah, this is just based on comments from Greg and people I've asked
since that discussion. I have seen questions on the user list
regarding pulling from things other then non-http but I can barely
remember any of them. And anyone I've asked doesn't even know we
support anything else other then http/https.
- Brett
On 08/09/2007, at 8:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
After thinking about Greg's comments I think it would be
interesting to ask people who actually uses anything but HTTP
repositories for consumption?
Deployment is a totally different story, but to radically simplify
the core what if we only allowed HTTP repositories for consumption
in 2.1?
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
