I'm not sure what you are asking... or why I'm being ping'd :-P

Awhile back I was trying to get a plugins params to not be replaced at all, which I was told was impossible. I'm not sure that is what you are looking for here.

Um, maybe you can jog my memory?

--jason


On Oct 7, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:

Ping.

On 10/4/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone?

On 9/13/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason D.?

On 9/12/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I remember Jason Dillon having a similar issue with the groovy stuff.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Nicoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 3:33 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Not replacing token in plugin's parameters

Hi,

In the trunk of the war plugin, the artifacts can be packaged in
WEB-INF/lib with a custom name, a la assembly plugin. This leads to a
config like this for instance:

<outputFileNameMapping>
  ${artifactId}.${extension}
</outputFileNameMapping>

This worked for a while and "suddently" (that's the weird thing) it
stopped. The reason for that is maven "now" (?) resolves the tokens
before injecting the value in the plugin (so for instance foo.null
where foo is the artifactId of the current project instead of
${artifactId}.${extension}).

Questions:

- I can reproduce with Maven 2.0.5, 2.0.6 and 2.0.7 so it's something
related to the plugin generation maybe?
- I am wondering if I could add a tag on field-level to disable this
automatic resolution

Any advice, thoughts?

Thanks,
Stéphane

[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-116
--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge

------------------------------------------------------------------- --
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------------- --
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge



--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge



--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to