On 06/11/2007, at 5:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

- adjusted DaysOldRepositoryPurgeTest for the changes

but there's no tests for the actual changes... :)

Modified: maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-base/archiva-consumers/ archiva-core-consumers/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/ consumers/core/repository/stubs/LuceneRepositoryContentIndexStub.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-base/ archiva-consumers/archiva-core-consumers/src/test/java/org/apache/ maven/archiva/consumers/core/repository/stubs/ LuceneRepositoryContentIndexStub.java? rev=592297&r1=592296&r2=592297&view=diff ====================================================================== ======== --- maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-base/archiva-consumers/archiva-core- consumers/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/consumers/core/ repository/stubs/LuceneRepositoryContentIndexStub.java (original) +++ maven/archiva/trunk/archiva-base/archiva-consumers/archiva-core- consumers/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/consumers/core/ repository/stubs/LuceneRepositoryContentIndexStub.java Mon Nov 5 22:16:12 2007
@@ -46,7 +46,10 @@
         throws RepositoryIndexException
     {
         // TODO Auto-generated method stub
-        Assert.assertEquals( 2, records.size() );
+        if( records.size() != 0 )
+        {
+            Assert.assertEquals( 2, records.size() );
+        }
     }

Is this likely to ever give a false-positive if it was meant to be two, but came out as 0?

Maybe it would be better to define the expected size in the constructor for the stub? (or use mock objects :)

Thanks,
Brett

--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Reply via email to