Milos Kleint wrote: > On Nov 6, 2007 4:35 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 6 Nov 07, at 4:00 AM 6 Nov 07, Milos Kleint wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've got a working prototype of the toolchains proposal. I'm able to >> > define >> > the jdk toolchains and have them used in a project. Works with patched >> > compiler, surefire, javadoc plugins. >> > details are at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains >> > >> > issues for resolution: >> > 1. currently using build-context, I heard stories about it going away. >> >> My only concern with the build-context, and John can counters as he >> deems fit, but it's hard to tell where through the core of Maven the >> context actually pops out. You still need to inspect the session, but >> the session would be the one place that you could look to see what is >> changing as it passes through the core. The rub right now is that many >> components internally are not setup to use a session. That's my >> opinion: that the session passing through the core could just as >> easily serve as a build context it's just architecturally the context >> is easier to wormhole through the code. > > > Possibly true. In order to move the toolchains code to session, we would > need a way to serialize/deserialize Objects. The actual live instances > cannot be used due to plugun classloading.
Just a suggestion: You might give XStream with the binary driver a try. Not as bloated as XML and your classes do not have to implement Serializable. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
