Heh, so you are willing to trade "build reproducibility" (for all projects linked to central repo) for "care about the community"? o.O
Hrm, please put that on a vote before you do it! IF you are talking about putting up "dummy" (depsless, only GAV) POMs: IMHO, by putting "dummy" poms (without dependency to not screw existing builds), only ones with GAV, you do not provide any value to community: OSS projects usually move fast, and will quickly switch to newer (hopefully fixed) artifacts from central with correct POMs. And the companies will... heh, they will use some "advanced repo manager" to solve it ;D IF not, how would you be able to get authoritative data to fill in the missing POMs? Thanks, ~t~ On Jan 28, 2008 7:51 PM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if there's no pom uploaded then you can take 5 minutes of your time > and provide one. I try to do it for all the ones I use. It can be > because you care about the community or because you are selfish and > want your project to be reproducible ;) either way providing a pom > doesnt take that long > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
