2008/2/26, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Agreed. Though it reminds me we really want to improve the links in > the top right on the plugin sites :) > > BTW, Raphaël, is there meant to be two copies of the site? I saw you > moved it to archetype-plugin, but it's still in archetype-site. I > don't think the archetype-site module is needed - the users only refer > to the plugin documentation. If you later want to document the > architecture/javadoc of the full set of modules that belongs back in > the top where you had it originally I think. >
Sorry i forgot to remove the site module from the commit I will try to grab some help from a deployer expert for insurance. . Rgards Raphaël > Cheers, > Brett > > > On 26/02/2008, at 10:10 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > > > I say push it. The quick look I did indicates it's already better > > than what's deployed so it can't hurt. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Raphaël Piéroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:08 PM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: stage archetype plugin site > > > > Hi > > > > I have a stage site for the archetype plugin. > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rafale/site/maven-archetype-plugin/ > > > > any remarks for improvement before real deploy? > > > > Regards, > > > > Raphaël > > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
