In general I think merging wagons together isn't a good idea. Lets keep them simple and easy to support. The last thing we need is more unused dependencies or worse, bugs in webdav affecting plain ol http.
--Brian -----Original Message----- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 1:52 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Wagon changes and WebDAV I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as 1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for deployment the required libraries necessary for deployment should be dependencies listed in the deployment plugin and not wired into the core. 2) The wagons can now be picked up with the dynamic collections so that's also not necessary to bind them in there. 3) Merging webdav into the main Wagon is a bad idea. Leave the simple provider alone and the more complicated ones are easy to add as dependencies or be loaded dynamically. For 2.0.x I don't care if the wagon stuff goes into the core because it's got the old container and it's never going to get upgraded. But the new stuff is fully capable of dealing with it and we don't need to couple a more stuff into the core. Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
