Same here, +1!

-- 
Fabrice
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -


On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1, have been using 2.4 SNAPSHOT for a long time now
>
> Thanks for pushing this out.
>
> -D
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I consider 2.3 totally and horribly broken, thus it is urgent to get 2.4
> > out asap. After that we can move to 2.5 as soon as someone has time to
> > apply the patches, test and release.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 5:52 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] Release maven-javadoc-plugin 2.4
> >
> > > [MJAVADOC-154] - Bump to plexus-utils:1.4.6
> >
> > Hm, this task is linked to an issue about a defect in BourneShell.
> > Another
> > BourneShell defect has been fixed in PLXUTILS-54 for plexus-utils:1.4.9.
> > Maybe worth to update once again to latest version?
> >
> > Also, maven-javadoc-plugin:2.4 is known to ignore generated sources in
> > contrast to previous versions (MJAVADOC-168). Really bump fix to next
> > version and break now?
> >
> > If the release is rolled back, the patch from MJAVADOC-162 might be
> > added as
> > well.
> >
> >
> > Benjamin
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to