Unfortunately the make-artifacts goal does not do the same, it does not name the artifact id's correctly and does not setup the heirarchy in the repository correctly, which is why it is deprecated I believe. \
I have responded to the issue and will maintain the rest of my responses to the issue. Thank you for the fast response! Apaar Trivedi -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:59 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: parameter needed in maven-eclipse-plugin i have answered to the issue, included here for reference. If you dont like the way the to-maven goal works you need to use the make-artifacts goal, it should do the same but allowing customization The qualifier is an important part of the version, it's not the same 3.3.0.x than 3.3.0.y so if Eclipse releases both versions we are not the people to strip it You can use dependencyManagement section to explicitly set the versions from Maven 2.0.9+ i've given a presentation at EclipseCON talking about this and other problems, will post them soon http://www.jroller.com/carlossg/entry/letters_from_eclipsecon On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Apaar Trivedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you, I have submitted an issue with a patch. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-405 > > Thanks again, > > Apaar > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:30 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: parameter needed in maven-eclipse-plugin > > You can open an issue and attach your patch. > We see with carlos if your change seems to be interesting to apply (I > think but I'm not an expert). > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Apaar Trivedi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have modified our copy locally and verified that what I am > > describing can be parameterized and it works. > > > > I can provide a patch for review if that is desired, or any > feedback > > > from Carlos or Brian would also be helpful. > > > > Thanks! > > Apaar > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: > Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:59 PM > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: Re: parameter needed in maven-eclipse-plugin > > Perhaps > Brian or Carlos could have an opinion about it (I think one > of > them added it). > > I didn't develop it and never played with this goal, thus I have > no > idea about it. > > > > Arnaud > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Apaar Trivedi > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hell, > > > > > > We need one thing parameterized on the EclipseToMavenMojo.java > in > the > > > maven-eclipse-plugin which should be parameterized > anyway. In the > > > > call to osgiVersionToMavenVersion, it only allows 'false' to be > > > passed in for the 'strip qualifier' parameter. > > > > > > While the make-artifacts (which extends to-maven) target allows > > you > to strip the qualifier, this is not a parameter that can be > > used in > the to-maven target. This is a problem because using > 'to-maven' > > > provides artifacts with the proper names but the dependecies do > > not > resolve due to the qualifiers on the versions. While > > make-artifacts > provides dependecies that resolve but the naming > > convention of the > groupId's and artifactId's is incorrect. > > > > > > Just a parameter -DstripQualifer that gets passed in to the > call to > > > osgiVersionToMavenVersion( String version, String > > > forcedQualifier, boolean stripQualifier ) would be perfect. > > > > > > Can I add this as a parameter and get this checked in or can > > someone > do it for me? Aside from not providing proper naming > > conventions, > make-artifacts is deprecated. > > > > > > Thanks for any help > > > > > > Apaar Trivedi > > > O: (512) 469-9300 x 128 > > > Blue Fish Development Group > > > http://www.bluefishgroup.com <http://www.bluefishgroup.com/> > Blue > > > > Fish is Hiring! Check out www.bluefishgroup.com/careers > > > <http://www.bluefishgroup.com/careers> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > .......................................................... > > Arnaud HERITIER > > .......................................................... > > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | > > blog.octo.com > .......................................................... > > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org > > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org > > ........................................................... > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > .......................................................... > Arnaud HERITIER > .......................................................... > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | > blog.octo.com .......................................................... > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org > ........................................................... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
