+1 We allready discussed to make maven 2.1 require java5, sot it's dependencies should also use java5. maven 2.0.x branch could then use retrotranslated versions.
2008/5/16 Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi folks, can we change the maven-artifact 3.0 bits to _attach_ instead of > _replace_ when retrotranslating? I'm consuming 3.0 for GShell, which > already requires Java 5, so the retrotranslation just tacks on ~600k of > stuff that I don't really need. > > I'd like to just use the pure Java5 version, and when using attach, the > retrotranslator-m-p will create a translated jar with a jdk14 classifier in > addition to the untranslated artifact. > > Please? > > --jason > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >