+1

We allready discussed to make maven 2.1 require java5, sot it's dependencies
should also use java5. maven 2.0.x branch could then use retrotranslated
versions.

2008/5/16 Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi folks, can we change the maven-artifact 3.0 bits to _attach_ instead of
> _replace_ when retrotranslating?  I'm consuming 3.0 for GShell, which
> already requires Java 5, so the retrotranslation just tacks on ~600k of
> stuff that I don't really need.
>
> I'd like to just use the pure Java5 version, and when using attach, the
> retrotranslator-m-p will create a translated jar with a jdk14 classifier in
> addition to the untranslated artifact.
>
> Please?
>
> --jason
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to