It's not a scope issue, it's a compiler options issue. You could just use the same mechanism that israfil flex mojo uses, which is to utilise the .flexLib / .actionScriptProperties files in order to determine whether to bind dependencies into the output or not.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Marvin Froeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh no, I can't do that. > > Doing this the plugin user will need to know how to resolve libraries. That > breaks all maven need. > > > VELO > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's an argument to the current resolution mechanism that lets you make a >> decision on whether to include every artifact. Maven has some standard >> filters for passing in lists in certain forms. You could look at the code of >> the assembly plugin for how those are used. >> >> How you configure it is up to you, but something like this would be >> expected: >> >> <runtimeLinkedLibraries> >> <includes> >> <include>someGroup:*</include> >> </includes> >> </runtimeLinkedLibraries> >> <mergedLinkedLibraries> >> <excludes> >> <exclude>someGroup:*</include> >> </excludes> >> </mergedLinkedLibraries> >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> >> On 05/06/2008, at 11:57 AM, Marvin Froeder wrote: >> >> Can you give me some light about how this plugins filters works? >>> A where to start... >>> >>> >>> VELO >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> It's debatable whether the artifact resolution mechanism should support >>>> customisable scopes - I can see some justification from this, but these >>>> would all be flex specific, not blended in with the current set. >>>> >>>> I would suggest that the best approach for you to take is to configure >>>> filters on the plugins to apply these types of linking to certain >>>> artifacts >>>> from the Maven runtime scope set. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Brett >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/06/2008, at 9:41 AM, Marvin Froeder wrote: >>>> >>>> Flex has 2 types of binaries SWC (jar like) and SWF runnable file, but is >>>> >>>>> not a library. >>>>> >>>>> Just keep in mind flex is very different from java. SWF files must be >>>>> all >>>>> required libraries bounded into it own binary in order to run or load at >>>>> runtime. >>>>> >>>>> Flex compiler has 5 ways to link libraries to application >>>>> * merged >>>>> * internal >>>>> * external >>>>> * runtime >>>>> * caching >>>>> >>>>> Merged will copy all required classes into the SWF. >>>>> Internal will copy all available classes into SWF >>>>> External will not copy (and in some situations application will not >>>>> work, >>>>> but this is flex way to do things) >>>>> Runtime will load the library over internet on runtime (means 2 SWC will >>>>> be >>>>> on server) >>>>> Caching will load some special optimized libraries like runtime. >>>>> >>>>> Just to be clear. >>>>> If I compile myLibrary with all external libraries will generate a very >>>>> small SWC. If all are merged will generate a little bigger SWC. If all >>>>> are >>>>> internal will generate a huge SWC file. Caching, runtime and external >>>>> will >>>>> all generate the smaller file, but caching and runtime are only for SWF, >>>>> so >>>>> no transitive problem. SWF are dead ends. Runnable, but no extendable. >>>>> >>>>> Right now, I define this on scopes. ie: >>>>> <dependency> >>>>> <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> >>>>> <artifactId>playerglobal</artifactId> >>>>> <version>10.0.0-beta-051508</version> >>>>> <type>swc</type> >>>>> <scope>external</scope> >>>>> </dependency> >>>>> >>>>> Well, when myLibrary has merged or internal libraries, those libraries >>>>> doesn't need to be transitive. myLibrary will be compiled with all >>>>> required >>>>> data. So transitivity make no sense. >>>>> >>>>> When I have a library with external libraries and this library is used >>>>> to >>>>> compile a application as merged, I need to merge all libraries, because >>>>> my >>>>> library have externalized others libraries content. >>>>> >>>>> Its a little confuse, specilly for who comes from Java. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> VELO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think you need to explain more about what the problem is. I'm not sure >>>>> >>>>>> you will need a new scope. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4-Jun-08, at 2:22 PM, Marvin Froeder wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I try this on users list, but now answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have develop my on plugin for compiling flex with maven ( >>>>>>> http://blog.flex-mojos.info/). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Flex is different from Java in several ways. One of this ways are >>>>>>> related >>>>>>> to libraries scopes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Was need to add other scopes in order to compile flex. Now I need to >>>>>>> customize maven dependency resolution mechanism to use some of this >>>>>>> dependencies as non transitive. The big question is, how? Pexus will >>>>>>> accept that? I will need to right my own resolution mechanism? Can >>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>> give me a light on this matter? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> VELO >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Jason van Zyl >>>>>> Founder, Apache Maven >>>>>> jason at sonatype dot com >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Unknown >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>> Brett Porter >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
