Vincent Siveton wrote:
IMHO devs should be after licenses, since they describe more a project than a build. [...] same reasoning for ML. [...] I propose to put dependencyManagement before dependencies to improve the readingness.
All fine with me. Also taking into account Paul Benedict's suggestion about the <properties> which makes sense to me, I believe our current sketch is
<modelVersion/> <parent/> <groupId/> <artifactId/> <version/> <packaging/> <name/> <description/> <url/> <inceptionYear/> <organization/> <licenses/> <developers/> <contributors/> <mailingLists/> <prerequisites/> <modules/> <scm/> <issueManagement/> <ciManagement/> <distributionManagement/> <properties/> <dependencyManagement/> <dependencies/> <repositories/> <pluginRepositories/> <build/> <reporting/> <profiles/> Benjamin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
