Olivier Lamy wrote:
My question is : why do prefer shitty (the name ? :- ) .
Good question ;-), but I believe this is irrelevant for the things Jason had in mind. As I understand, the intention was to try out how the plugins work with Maven 2.1. But that merely requires to build them with that particular version of Maven. During this build, the plugins will be invoked as part of the default lifecycle and later on in some of their own ITs. Whether these ITs are launched by Invoker, Shitty or something else shouldn't matter, they both are just plugins executed by Maven 2.1. The only important thing is to make sure the IT plugins use the same Maven for the forked builds as the main build. This should be the case for Invoker and Shitty as far as I can tell, both query ${maven.home} to locate the Maven executable.
Benjamin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
