http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=143319 can be consider serious issue found in wagon beta-3
Milos On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have a specific problem other then the few things that have cropped > up, but the vast majority of people have not tried the new wagon and you > honestly have no idea what's going to happen. I would just rather be safe > then repentant. > > I not to worried about fiddling versions, I just want to patch fix what was > used for the last release myself. It's generally the case that we have > problems when we do this. > > I personally don't think it's for "no good reason": I want to do what we > just decided to do with Maven itself. With Wagon we should have just cut the > release and moved on. > > On 24-Aug-08, at 7:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> Do you have an actual problem you are trying to fix? If you don't want to >> go hunting and need help, just ask. There's no point fiddling versions and >> creating more confusion for no reason. >> >> Seriously, Wagon should be the least of your concerns in trying to >> stabilise things there. How about telling us what you are trying to achieve >> or the problems you're having instead? A month ago you were stabilising, a >> couple of weeks ago you were intent on rewriting significant parts, now >> you're stabilising for release again. Instead of being able to dig in and >> help out, we're wasting time trying to figure out what to call things. >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> On 25/08/2008, at 11:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >>> In short I don't want to go hunting, and akin to what we're going with >>> 2.0.x and 2.1.x. The changes were too great for a beta and I don't really >>> want to put them into the 3.0-alpha-1 release. >>> >>> That is significant: >>> >>> >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10335&fixfor=12544 >>> >>> If the bug fixes could be separated from large refactoring I could live >>> with it. Nothing immensely terrible seems to be happening to the 2.0.9 folks >>> using beta-2. >>> >>> I meant rollback to beta-2 for a 1.0.x and then take the 1.0-beta-3 for >>> Wagon 1.1.x. >>> >>> I think 2.0.x should stay with what I suggest as Wagon 1.0.x and let >>> 2.1.x use Wagon 1.1.x. >>> >>> On 24-Aug-08, at 5:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 25/08/2008, at 7:50 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>>> >>>>> proxies don't work properly in beta-4. >>>> >>>> Are you recalling this from memory or have a particular bug? Proxies >>>> weren't working in beta-3 because I made a stupid typo and there wasn't a >>>> test case, not because of the significance of changes. That got fixed in >>>> beta-4. >>>> >>>> John reported a potential backwards compatibility issue >>>> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-234), but it hasn't been confirmed >>>> yet. Is this what you are seeing? >>>> >>>> - Brett >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brett Porter >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> Jason van Zyl >>> Founder, Apache Maven >>> jason at sonatype dot com >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> A party which is not afraid of letting culture, >>> business, and welfare go to ruin completely can >>> be omnipotent for a while. >>> >>> -- Jakob Burckhardt >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > jason at sonatype dot com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good people can fix > bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad people. > > -- Paul Graham > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
