Brian E. Fox wrote:
Exactly. I don't think we need to reopen this up to a bunch more
changes, we can make more releases later. If I thought we would be
opening a can of worms for this originally, I probably wouldn't have
been in favor of it. My understanding was that 2.0.10 became 2.1.0 and
more changes would follow on 2.x since we moved out 3.0.


I agree with Brian. However tempting to have more features creep in because of the new dot release (as opposed to dot dot) it's better to release a stable version (on which there is now a consensus that it has sufficiently evolved from 2.0.x branch) and focus on next release.

Release early, release often ... etc :-)

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to