I agree - I ran into this last night trying to test some internal tooling...
James On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:19 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 19/09/2008, at 1:31 AM, John Casey wrote: > > > What are you trying to accomplish? Maybe I can help you out more if > > I know that? > > I was just wondering if we were only voting on the release of the > tarballs, or if we were voting on the stage repository contents as well. > > On 19/09/2008, at 1:30 AM, John Casey wrote: > > > I've only been running 'mvn clean release:prepare release:perform', > > and using a staging location that separates artifacts by artifactId > > and version directories, to keep from messing up the stage:copy > > plugin eventually. So, no, I don't think that will produce a staging > > repository where all of the artifacts are together, though it will > > produce a _series_ of staged repositories of the form: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/<artifact-id>/2.1.0-M1/ > > > > where each one contains that single artifact. > > > If we're to vote on it, I'd prefer they be kept in one repository in > future (just delete it each time). This allows easy testing by adding > it as a remote repo and building projects that use the Maven libraries. > > Thanks, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
