Oh. I saw that. I guess I read more into it. I had this crazy idea that
someone was thinking of using jackrabbit as their Maven repository.
Actually, making Jackrabbit into a repository isn't a bad idea at all.
In any case, it seems what you are saying is that there is simply a
choice in whether to fix the existing implementation vs switching to
mercury.
Ralph
John Casey wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/WebDAV-deploying-bug-with-Maven-2.1.0-M1-to19673500.html
Admittedly, not a real healthy discussion, but IMO it might be
worthwhile to discuss. The jackrabbit implementation is new as of
1.0-beta-3 (really beta-4, since beta-3 is badly broken), and mercury
has been under a LOT of development lately, and I know folks are
putting quite a bit of effort into testing and documenting it...so it
seems like it might be a better way to go.
We have to fix MDEPLOY-85, and that means at a minimum a new release
of wagon-webdav-jackrabbit...at that point, we have an opportunity to
make a decision about which webdav to use.
BTW, we should also talk about a "pointer" wagon-webdav project that
could simply house a relocation section that points to the current
preferred wagon webDAV impl artifactId. This is a bit of a problem in
beta-4, according to some people I've talked to, since the old
wagon-webdav is no longer available.
-j
---
John Casey
Developer and PMC Member, Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp
Ralph Goers wrote:
I don't recall seeing a discussion on jackrabbit vs mercury. Do you
have a link?
John Casey wrote:
I'm stuck in assembly-plugin mode for the moment, but if you want to
move forward with it, go ahead. FWIW, we also need to put the 2.1
release plan to a vote, particularly given the little bit of
discussion we've had over jackrabbit vs. mercury.
...all things I haven't had time to clear off my to-do list for the
last week or two.
-john
---
John Casey
Developer and PMC Member, Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone opposed to moving forward with a (likely much shorter)
2.0.10 release cycle with what is already on the branch now?
Was anyone already planning to do this?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
