ITs passed without any problem upgrade done in r745216
Regards, Hervé Le lundi 16 février 2009, Jason van Zyl a écrit : > I assume you've tried it with 2.1? If all the same integration tests > pass then I don't see any downside. > > On 15-Feb-09, at 5:52 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > I'll try to get a summary of release notes for 1.0 [1] > > > > bugfixes: > > - MODELLO-152: Strict parsing mode doesn't detect missing root element > > - MODELLO-153: Default value doesn't work for attributes > > - MODELLO-154: xsd plugin does not honour xml.associationTagName > > > > enhancements: > > - MODELLO-155: support $version in xml.namespace > > - MODELLO-139: add encoding support to CLI > > - MODELLO-143: add an option to xdoc to add a separator before a field > > documentation (to have a more readable documentation) > > - a lot of model parameters have been renamed/moved for better > > consistency > > > > +: > > - keep model in sync with Maven 3.0, when previous enhancements will > > be used > > - prepare to benefit from future 1.0.1 (MODELLO-179, fixes, ...) > > > > > > FYI, for the moment, thanks to improved unit-tests, there are no > > regressions > > found in 1.0-alpha-22 or 1.0: the only regressions found by Benjamin > > are in > > xdoc, for which unit-tests lack asserts (if anybody find a way to > > add more > > asserts, I'm interested...) > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > [1] http://modello.codehaus.org/release-notes.html > > > > Le dimanche 15 février 2009, Brian E. Fox a écrit : > >> What benefits in 2.1 would we get by upgrading? > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:15 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: use Modello 1.0 in Maven 2.1.x > >> > >> Maven 3.x recently upgraded Modello to 1.0 in r743174, and > >> Benjamin used > >> it to integrate generics in r744572 (thank you). > >> > >> With Modello 1.0, there are a lot of little improvements that can > >> be done > >> on models. Before doing so, I'd like to upgrade Modello version for > >> 2.1.x > >> branch: I'm pretty confident this won't cause any regression. > >> > >> Any objection? Or any preference on when to do it to avoid risks on > >> Maven > >> 2.1 release plan? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Hervé > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > jason at sonatype dot com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > the course of true love never did run smooth ... > > -- Shakespeare > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
