The Eclipse legal team is having a hard time trying to confirm code provenance for the plexus components required by the 3.0 maven embedder.
I suppose that the Apache Foundation has already done similar provenance checks before distributing the components... so can you please help us with the Eclipse review? Specifically, the legal team has asked: ··· > For example, it would be helpful to know whether Plexus project members > and > contributors are asked to acknowledge anything regarding their > contribution in > an e-mail (e.g. I wrote the code, it's mine, and I'm contributing it to > Plexus > for distribution under the Apache 1.1 or Apache 2.0 license). > ··· Does such thing (or anything similar) exist? Does Apache keep some records regarding the 3rd party checks it performs before a release? Thanks! ----- http://www.linkedin.com/in/amuino Abel Muiño Vizcaino - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Code-provenance-checks-for-Plexus-components-tp22251436p22251436.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
